Public Policy Violations & Claims

In addition to discrimination and whistleblowing retaliation, an employer may face liability if an employee has been terminated in violation of public policy.  These public policy claims have become known as “Pierce” claims, having arisen from a case, Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 84 N.J. 58 (1980).  Pierce claims have been applied to cases where an employee may not fit into a protected class and may not have blown the whistle, yet still finds himself or herself terminated for a reason that violates public policy.

Some examples of public policy violations and claims in NJ where successful plaintiffs have established a cause of action for a Pierce claim include where an employer has unconstitutionally and unreasonably required an employee to submit to a drug test; where an employee has been terminated for filing a workers’ compensation claim; and where an employer terminated an employee because the employer objected to an employee’s private consensual sexual activities.

Recently, there has been much litigation regarding marijuana use for disabilities. Employers must accommodate employees who are prescribed marijuana or other THC/CDB products for their disabilities.  Employers must also accommodate employees who cannot receive vaccinations due to medical or religious reasons.

Although many Pierce claims may also be protected under the Conscientious Employee Protection Act and therefore waived, there are many other situations where no statute protects an employee, but a common law Pierce claim may still be viable. As a top employment lawyer in NJ, Schorr & Associates has litigated many successful Pierce claims and can assist you in understanding whether a termination violates public policy, and is therefore actionable. Contact us for a free initial telephone consultation today.

Interested in more information?

Watch our short video on the subject below. Contact us if you have any questions.

Request a Free Initial Consultation






    DISCLAIMER: The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. The use of the Internet for communications with Schorr & Associates, P.C. will not establish an attorney-client relationship and messages containing confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent.


    captcha

    Related Practice Areas

    Retaliation

    The New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (NJLAD), New Jersey’s Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA), the New Jersey Civil Rights Act (NJCRA), the…

    LEARN MORE ABOUT THIS ISSUE

    Whistleblower Protection

    New Jersey’s Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA) is one of the broadest and most powerful whistleblower protection statutes in the United States. CEPA protects…

    LEARN MORE ABOUT THIS ISSUE

    Breach Of Contract

    The New Jersey Law Against Discrimination broadly protects against discrimination on the basis of sex or gender. This also includes protection against discrimination…

    LEARN MORE ABOUT THIS ISSUE

    Discriminatory Terminations

    New Jersey’s Law Against Discrimination (LAD) provides broad protection against discrimination. If you are discriminated against because you…

    LEARN MORE ABOUT THIS ISSUE

    Public Policy Violations

    In addition to discrimination and whistleblowing retaliation, an employer may face a wrongful termination suit if an employee has been terminated in violation of public policy. These public policy claims…

    LEARN MORE ABOUT THIS ISSUE

    Contact Schorr & Associates today for more information.